Political Systems UK USA COL

United Kingdom: This country has a parliamentary monarchical government system, where the king / queen has the function of head of state, and the prime minister assumes the role of head of government; The parliament is made up of two chambers, one is designated by the monarch and the other is by popular election, this parliament is in charge of determining who is the ideal one for the queen to designate to be the prime minister, for that reason it is assumed that the power that politician that falls on the queen is empowered and promulgated by the parliament and the prime minister. The British crown is in charge of the protection of 4 constituted nations: "Scotland, Wales, England and Northern Ireland", so that the constituted power includes the acceptance of a large diverse population, this acceptance by the people is by the monarchical tradition Throughout European history, also because the people are heard through the popular election of a part of the Parliament, however, since the signing of the Magna Carta by John I of England, the monarchical power was increasingly limited to institutionalism.

United States: The North American nation is governed under a presidential system, where the head of state and government are assumed by a democratically elected representative; Executive power is also assumed by the state governors, who have a certain autonomy of political decision in relation to their territory at the national level, so that each state can legislate in whatever it deems appropriate. The legislative branch is also elected by the people, the congress is bicameral where the senate is represented by 2 people from each state, and the chamber of representatives is proportionally represented by the population of each state, in this way it is assumed that power is balanced because the president will not always be from the same political party as the members of the congress.

Colombia: It is a presidential constitutional republic, where the executive power is determined by popular election, however, the president designates his political cabinet represented in the ministers; As a constitutional monarchy, the president assigns the directors of administrative departments, who are in charge of ensuring that the president performs a good administration of his public function, that is, he himself assigns his evaluators. He also assigns the heads of public entities such as the armed forces, diplomatic agents, and as if that were not enough, he has the power to establish new public positions that he demands in the central administration. Despite this, the president cannot override international treaties, human rights and the constitution as the functions that it confers on him.

The parliamentary political system itself would be of great help for the balance of power that is polarized in our country, however, the English parliamentary system in particular would not be the ideal one to replace the current system, since the Colombian constitutional presidential system has empowered the president to have almost the same power as the queen of England, since the president has the power to appoint positions of public officials who constantly interfere in the presidential political development in question, therefore, I think that the English parliamentary system is effective in As for associating the needs of the 4 nations that make up its territory, but it is not specific in terms of specific regions as is a federal system like the American one.

Therefore, I think that if we could change the current political system, it would be to a federal system similar to the North American one, although Colombia has already passed through this type of state in its history, I consider it reasonable to retake it because: the specificity of the state rulers in their territorial context have a better perspective than a global vision by a national institution, for example, in Colombia where the diversity of regions is clear, the needs of the Caribbean or Atlantic territories are not the same as those of the Amazon or the Orinoquia, so the Legislation would be directed by more suitable people to carry it out, in the case of Cauca, where violence has invaded the countryside for many years, illicit crops have been the daily bread in most of the territory, for which, recently at the In the national country, the cultivation of medical marijuana was legalized in search of economic export projects, but this conclusion would have been reached before if the decision were in the hands of the Caucasians themselves. Another example would be the peaceful region, which is one of the richest in the country in natural resources and biodiversity, but it is the poorest in economic areas, and this is because the eyes of the members of the public power are fixed on the capital regions, lately in Caquetá due to the economic interests of oil.

Colombia, which has been influenced by French law, American law, and old Spanish law, is pursuing more liberal development strategies. The Colombian constitution and international treaties have enabled the continual growth of public policy in favor of the less favored; thus, it would be surprising if changing the political system is a desirable choice, because the entire substance of the lost right would be gone. Throughout the country's history, it has been amassed.